|
|
Post by 4l04ever on Nov 21, 2022 20:18:19 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by 4l04ever on Nov 21, 2022 20:20:22 GMT 1
And diss   |
|
|
|
Post by 4l04ever on Nov 21, 2022 20:23:43 GMT 1
And one mo..   |
|
|
|
Post by donkeychomp on Nov 21, 2022 23:28:11 GMT 1
No idea who did that but it's piggin awful. And that's done digitally? I'd be embarrassed to call that any of my work.
Alex
|
|
|
|
Post by steve h on Nov 22, 2022 0:00:37 GMT 1
Masterpiece or Ringpiece...your choice.
Did Piccaso have brown fingers?
|
|
|
|
Post by 4l04ever on Nov 23, 2022 22:56:46 GMT 1
All the above images were created by an Artificial Intelligence system called Dall-E2. By just giving a very brief description the original artwork was created in seconds. Every one it creates is unique even if given the same description many times over.
Some of the images it produces cannot be identified as being created by AI rather than a human.
|
|
|
|
Post by steve h on Nov 23, 2022 23:13:36 GMT 1
Where did it get the idea that a couple of them had been shot in the eye?  |
|
|
|
Post by 4l04ever on Nov 23, 2022 23:15:48 GMT 1
It does the same as a human and browses the web for reference pics.  |
|
|
|
Post by steve h on Nov 23, 2022 23:20:32 GMT 1
Maybe the setting is on impressionism or abstract?
I did have an inkling that the one in a brown jacket was Phil Read?
|
|
|
|
Post by 4l04ever on Nov 23, 2022 23:21:58 GMT 1
If you don't specify, it will do its own thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by donkeychomp on Nov 23, 2022 23:50:20 GMT 1
Reminds me of the film I Robot, very very loosely named after the superb Isaac Asimov novel, where a robot sketches a scene in seconds and carves a chair from wood in even less time. Leaves the question...is it art if an artificial thing has created it?
I say no. Art comes from within and not something from a machine. Don't get me wrong, it's amazing how far these things have come in a very short time but how soon will it be when they start making robots that replace humans? And I don't mean assembly bots, I mean walking talking robots. Not sure if that's a great idea or a idiotic one. Even programmed with the 3 laws they'd still take away something that a human used to do...and then what becomes of that human?
Alex
|
|
|
|
Post by dusty350 on Nov 24, 2022 8:30:23 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by donkeychomp on Nov 24, 2022 12:16:03 GMT 1
Eek.
Alex
|
|
|
|
Post by steve h on Nov 24, 2022 17:32:44 GMT 1
Reminds me of the film I Robot, very very loosely named after the superb Isaac Asimov novel, where a robot sketches a scene in seconds and carves a chair from wood in even less time. Leaves the question...is it art if an artificial thing has created it? I say no. Art comes from within and not something from a machine. Don't get me wrong, it's amazing how far these things have come in a very short time but how soon will it be when they start making robots that replace humans? And I don't mean assembly bots, I mean walking talking robots. Not sure if that's a great idea or a idiotic one. Even programmed with the 3 laws they'd still take away something that a human used to do...and then what becomes of that human? Alex Redundant? Like the rest of them. They are already controlled (via apps) and believe anything they are told unquestioningly.... I refuse to shop in a self service bay, and pay at the booth for fuel. Tech is a tool not a replacement for us or God. Bloody marvelous watching CNC machinery though.  Art is something from its creator, a part of their being. And it's whatever you think it is or what you want it to be...even an upturned urinal..... |
|
