|
|
Post by billbott on Mar 28, 2016 15:58:13 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by arrow on Mar 28, 2016 16:05:16 GMT 1
They seem a bit expensive, with the scratches etc. Might be worth that if mint. They do go for decent money these days.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yogi on Mar 28, 2016 17:01:34 GMT 1
Someone's had too much Easter cheer,,,HIC,,, HIC
|
|
|
|
Post by looey on Mar 28, 2016 17:12:25 GMT 1
Being the least desirable later droopy can type, and with the damage & rust, £250 maybe ?   |
|
|
|
Post by robin on Mar 28, 2016 17:17:31 GMT 1
 See Kenny for a pair of these instead... |
|
|
|
Post by rigga on Mar 28, 2016 17:28:40 GMT 1
£200 no way near what he's asking ..... wonder what offers he'll get
|
|
|
|
Post by arrow on Mar 28, 2016 17:30:50 GMT 1
Seems like I may have made an error of judgment here.
|
|
|
|
Post by iwantalc on Mar 28, 2016 18:00:08 GMT 1
thought original small can microns didn't have bolt on end cans..
|
|
|
|
Post by looey on Mar 28, 2016 18:35:40 GMT 1
thought original small can microns didn't have bolt on end cans.. They didn't, these are the later larger can bolt on type |
|
|
|
Post by iwantalc on Mar 28, 2016 18:54:59 GMT 1
thought original small can microns didn't have bolt on end cans.. They didn't, these are the later larger can bolt on type just noticed that too many bank holiday fosters |
|
|
|
Post by KevtheRev on Mar 28, 2016 19:48:41 GMT 1
They must be made of pure feckin' Unobtainium boy !
|
|
|
|
Post by steve h on Mar 28, 2016 20:17:50 GMT 1
Yes its a misprint billbott......should read £1850 |
|
