337lma
Weekend rider
Posts: 84
|
Post by 337lma on Sept 8, 2013 17:23:26 GMT 1
Is there any performance difference between the aircooled RD 250 and the later LC 250. I know that bhp figures of the day identified the LC was more powerful. There are a few aircooled 250s for sale and they seem better value than the LC or Suzuki X 7, Leigh
|
|
|
|
Post by lckid on Sept 10, 2013 20:04:50 GMT 1
Yes loads! ive had a RD250E and a RD250LC the LC is much quicker overall and lighter I think its only 5 hp difference but the LC has a better PTWR.
|
|
|
|
Post by steve h on Sept 10, 2013 20:53:16 GMT 1
Agree with the above. The LC is a "better" bike in performance. They are in a different league compared to the aircooled bikes. BUT
DONT let that put you off owning an aircooled. They are a perfectly capable bike!!!!
I'm on my 3rd 250e & 2nd 250LC.
|
|
337lma
Weekend rider
Posts: 84
|
Post by 337lma on Sept 10, 2013 23:20:44 GMT 1
Much appreciated, I have never owned an aircooled RD, but will consider buying one,thanks Leigh
|
|
|
|
Post by butchers on Sept 14, 2013 22:17:33 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Norbo on Sept 18, 2013 8:55:21 GMT 1
As Butch says ether will put a smile on your face But the LC is far better but far more money . so if your happy with an A/C just go for it I have 1 and still like to ride if from time to time and it's still fun .
|
|
